|About||1 week ago|
Angelia Jolie hasn't looked that life like in a long time
none of them look "animated" though.
holy FUCK... what's real now days...
These are all pretty well done, but yes. You can still tell. There's always something slightly off.
I can say anything I want on the internet and everyone will believe me!!
I think it's because the person is so fucking basic in the first place
Someday we may not need actors anymore.
Lighting almost always gives it away
Yeah animated is the wrong word...
I can, actually. Are you familiar with the concept of the uncanny valley?
The first one is the most deceiving imo based on the face as well as how the skin looks
Exactly this. You can’t put your finger on it, but it’s like your gut is telling you something is wrong.
Nevermind number 8 also looks creepy realistic
Yeah, that was the only one I had to stop and check again.
You tell em! You can trust me, I'm Abraham Lincoln.
Technically anything on a computer screen is CGI.
It’s the eyes of you can see their eyes it’s easy
It’s the eyes for me always look wrong
This person needs work on their mouth skills as well. It was the most obvious part for me.
Uncanny valley. This would have pissed me off if I didn't know why
Probably because it isn’t signed and op put it there to fuck with us 😂
Daniel Craig looks the realest
I thought it was a gallery of celebs with a retard twist before reading the title.
Clearly there's no WAYYYYYY we're all just living in the Matrix. Nope. Not at all
Only someone who was legally blind would say that they couldn't tell the difference
The skin. Waxy. Looks too translucent.
Thank you for that phrase.. it’s been a wild ride looking up ‘uncanny valley’
And the skin looks...waxy.
Yeah but none of these are animated though
Definitely eyes. CGI can't put life into them. Or nuclear madness in Ghandi's.
You shouldn't have told everyone they were cg in the headline. Also, yes quite easily. Some of them are absolutely fantastic work, but not >
They just don't look alive to me
> good enough to fool the human senses. Uncanny Valley is strong here.
the overall shaping of heads and arms bugged me
Yes but mostly people look fake to me
No one likes the uncanny valley.
They have a real wax figure look too them... I don't like it.
Ha! why didn't i think of that?
Yeah I noticed mouths were off. Still great looking work.
Welcome to uncanny valley.
So why can’t this artist post some CGI boobs and call it “art”??
For me it's the texture of the skin. CGI always looks too smooth.
Want to drag my peen through some uncanny valleys.
Literally left this post after I saw it and burst out laughing after I read this and came back just to say that I laughed out loud to this.
People are so critical! All u van say is WOW!!!
Like a doll’s eyes.
Here's what I think: OP doesn't know the meaning of the word animated.
It's easy to tell which ones are fake because the girls are looking at me
I'm in VFX and I can confirm none of these images are moving therefore none are animated. They are modelled and rendered spectacularly!
I couldn't, but now that you mention it...
Like high quality plastic at some parts/places
Generic male No. 3
They look like early 20th century post mortem photos - I see dead people
Site your sources! - Abraham Lincoln
You can always tell because the eyes.
These are put forth so that the real nonhumans seem more human. Nice try, lizards
this doesnt look like anything to me
You're not real!
The deleted comment is at 5/7. Classic imgur.
The eyes, hair, and reflections give it away. Especially the eyes
Damn...you took my gif idea.
Society has taken the word to be used for actually moving pieces yet the definition never changed. Look it up pls, learn something for once.
What about 23? He looks real to me.
There wasn’t enough boobs to make a positive id
Jesus you sound bitter.
They all look like resident evil charcters to me
Came here to bring that up, some of them are less obvious but all of them give me the heebie jeebies.
Nice improvement, almost there
The truth is in the eyes
UNCANNY VALLEY. CREEP. E.
There's no life in the eyes, and the skin has that almost waxy look to it only simulated people have.
Eyes look soulless
They look like as if they took a bath in Botox. Otherwise pretty good.
I see dead people
Since you told me in the title, yes I can tell.
Yep. Dead eyes. There's a great deal of excellent work here in the composition but it's either the eyes or there's a cartoonish quality.
I’d argue the bratz dolls are pretty obvious...and the tiny hands
I think we haven't broke through this yet. We used to call that "lifeless perfection"
But at least the look says "I'm done with your shit" so it's close.
*Rendered to perfection. These are still images, and therefore not Animated. Photorealistic animation is an order of magnitude harder.
Well thanks to the uncanny valley yes, for me specifically it's the eyes a dead give away
With the amount of airbrushing done in photos today these look more realistic than some people do
I would be down with this if the porn industry would adopt it. We don’t need real people in porn
Uncanny Valley at maximum levels
So there probably is software out there that let's you take anyone's face and put then in whatever situation you want
Does anyone else have the most confusing boner right now?
Some look a lot more real than others
I’ll take “uncanny Valley” for five hundred, Alex
The eyes give it away Everytime.
There are gonna be some weird porn lawsuits in the future; Starting with Ellen Page! Oh wait..
I call BS on the Daniel Craig. That's a real photo.
How is this on the fp? This is shit.
Some more than others look real. But odd lighting can make anyone look fake. CGI is getting closer.
Some I can tell. Some I don’t believe
Disappointed in the lack of artistic boobage here op. Misleading.
I was so sure the last would be Michael Cera!
Now we call it marriage
The eyes reveal a lot, mostly emptiness.
It’s the lighting for me. The specular maps make some of these look like plastic.
There's a nude pic of her.. it?
I thought he was gonna nuke me
Some yes. Some no. Porn is going to get interresting.
yeah i can. Also they're all obviously based on models and real life photos. so like make a person thats not based on person.
Great. The random excessive blur is the dead giveaway.
Man, porn is going to get interesting in the next few years.
You should not have given it away in the beginning, that certainly made me doubt everything even more i perhaps would have. Some are ok.
"Animated" I dont think you know what that word means.
Pretty much can't tell at all. We're basically there.
Uncanny valley errrrrr...
They look like wax statues.
There is so much uncanny valley in this post. So goddamn much. Especially number 10, no actual human being looks like that.
they all look too damn shiny
Most of these aren't uncanny valley though, you can instantly tell what you're looking at isn't real (and why).
The best: 12, 15, 17, 19, 25
As a professional photographer, numbers 8 and 25 are spectacular, then the Joker. It's getting scary real with video card ability these days
Gandhi wasn’t that great of a person
We're so deep in the uncanny valley, there's literally no cans here
yeah, some of these would be much more difficult to figure out if it was like: "CGI or wax model?" lol
They are *too* perfect. And like many have said, lifeless especially in the eyes. Last one is pretty good, though.
They look as terrible as CGI Tarkin and Leia in Rogue One lol.
Some of these are better than others. The occasional is exceptional, the rest I can tell something is off, heh.
I can too, they look like wax figures.
They look fake as frack.. It's a complete dead giveaway and that's why CGI will never replace practical effects or actual people. It's 2 obv
I just felt like it looked too perfect to be a real person. Something isn’t quite right with it
Yes, I do. I wish you did. I am genuinely curious, but did you look up the definition or just go by what society has deemed it means to you?
Ideally, the peen would be the one forging the way forward.
Rendered. The word you wanted is “rendered.”
That's impressive, I did not read title first. I saw boobs and lost my thoughts. Done look great and some it's easier to tell. BOOOOOOBS
Just out of curiosity, when a person is "made" in cgi, is there any asymmetry built in? Because if I remember right, all of our faces are
Oh how I wish the first one was real ..
The future of video gaming is looking quite promising
Must be nice working off a real model
Sorry again, but I am using the word correctly, based on its actual definition. Funny, but I am guessing you still haven't looked it up.
JUST slightly asymmetrical and thus a perfectly symmetrical face seems just a bit "off" for us.
Yes but it’s awesome
Something about his mouth is throwing me off, not exactly sure what though
At first glance, some of them look real. Then once you look at them longer, you sense the wrongness.
I think you need to reevaluate the term, because you've got it wrong.....
It’s all about the hair for me it’s the only thing cgi very rarely gets just rite.
There are a few telltale signs that give away each of these, but I'm honestly not sure I'd have gotten it if you hadn't put it in the title
What definition have you looked at that suggests otherwise??
Yeah I can. Because I talk to real people.
a digital drawing.
There are definitely a few that I wouldn't have looked twice at had OP not said they were fake.
Mia Just Call me Diana
The hair. It's the hair. Dead give away.
I see lots of detail, but a lot of them are missing the spark in the eyes that truly makes them look real. It's somewhat unsettling
Very well done, eclectic subjects. Some of the reflections are faked too hard, render times? Also DOF is too forced in some, but...
"Animated" none of them are moving...
the eyes always give it away.
Most definitely do
wow taste really is individual
Animated in society means like an animated film, moving. Definition - having the appearance of something alive. Seems appropriate here.
... artistic license over rides. Last I could not dream to texture @ that level. Niiice! :D
"Animation is a dynamic medium in which images or objects are manipulated to appear as moving images." Not a one of these appears to move.
you're just horny and that fucks with your brain, bran
Yes, either airbrushed or waxy looking. The “male model” image though, I’d probably believe that was real. Others were close.
That's not what uncanny valley is.
Or you do. Uncanny valley is when something appears real but something just feels inexplicably off. You can tell what's off in most of these
if they were moving around in movie i might not notice.
Some of these have safely crossed the uncanny valley, but quite a few are still in it.
These were all sculpted, rendered, lit, and modeled using computer software, but I see no evidence of animation in your post.
I think the stubble is too uniform and perfectly similar and even, but that might be the only think that stands out. MAYBE the lips.
Angelina Jolie has never looked like that. That is the worst of the set in terms of uncanny valley.
Just porn? Fabricated footage is going to make camera footage useless in court. "I have video evidence that (innocent guy) is guilty. Scary.
Really? I’ve always found that CGI can’t do beards well. Looks real, but with makeup beard.
-But I agree it is easily the most believable as a generic male model fashion shot.
7 is no fucking way, that absolutely looks like a real man, out of everything here I would absolutely believe that if you said it was a phot
Key word: near. These all look fake as shit
was gonna come in here calling you a liar liar pants on fire but then I saw the comments and I can't trust anything anymore
4 and 18 are the only ones that I say look almost real
Haha, c'mon my friend, a word can have more than 1 definition lol. From websters, Animated - having the appearance of something alive.
5,14,20,22,24 looks like yea the rest look legit as all heck
animated would be if they moved in any way. these are computer rendered, but they're not animated.
They look like wax.
Exactly what i get when i see trannies. I haven’t been wrong yet.
I wonder if there will be movies in the future with dead actors completely recreated in CGI, and their audio samples combined from old films
Jawline for me
For me it's the lighting. Things that are perfectly reflective when they shouldn't be and the skin being too uniformly lit.
If you forget again, search “why clowns are creepy” it usually comes up with uncanny valley.
Well to be fair, I don't think Jack Nicholson is a real person anyway. More like some sort of Lovecraftian insanity given human shape.
Very much yes on number one, less so to varying degrees on the rest. They look good tho
But the hair is quite different.
Some of these look like straight up digital paintings.
I’m convinced that I don’t have an uncanny valley. Too many video games...
Yes, I can, easily.
some i would accept as photographs without question, some there is visibly something off.
I was thinking they could make a Star Wars movie takes place after Episode 6 (but before Episode 7) with younger versions of the actors.
most feel kinda wax figure-ish
but then i also wonder if i’d be able to “tell” had i not read the title?
Same, kinda shows that there’s another element to being human aside from photo realism.
Yea some seem like typical doctored pictures but I dunmo.
Yes I can
Funnily it is mostly the old people who seem real to me, while you might think they would be more difficult to do.
It’s the eyes or the skin. No one ever gives them the right kind of life.
With CGI. or even just a whole movie (doesn't have to be Star Wars ) made completely with CGI
Wow I'm seeing more plastic than a card reader.
Some are apparent, monica belluci, daniel craig, sandra bullock and the naked blonde with the glasses.
Because I have eyeballs.
The only fully CGI movie I know of is Final Fantasy Spirits Within and that was made so long ago the graphics don't look that good anymore
My CPU is melting just looking..
they're pretty good because they're coppied from a real picture. i think it would have been different had they been CGI-ed from scratch...
The eyes always give it away
Lighting, skin, metallic shininess. A lot of cluse, doesn't help it that it is retracted images making it even more uncanny
I was going to mention this actually. In this case the thing I noticed was that everything was a little too perfect.
So when do we get porn with such realistic Monica Belucci, Angelina Jolie and other Hollywood actor CGI doubles?
Yeah, you’d be wrong in this case buddy.
Whelp that's a first for me. Never thought of applying the uncanny valley to that issue lol. +1.
Now if OP hadn’t told me they were cgi, I’d probably think these were taken by a bad photographer. But they don’t look quite right
Some of them look like real objects, but not real people. Like waxworks.
if OP didnt put CGI in the title, you wouldnt.
You sound basic just because you use the term “basic.”
Lighting, eye shape/size, and skin coloration
Some I can tell instantly, some its one or two details, some are /almost/ perfect, seeing them actually be animated would be the real test.
The uncanny valley is that the closer to real something is, the more your brain finds that something’s off. You don’t have to think it’s /
12 isnt cgi. you cant cgi insanity
The expression makes it worse, she might was well be T-posing.
almost, but not quite. The whites of his eyes doesn't have enough texture and the hair is too well groomed on the sides
real. The idea is that Shrek looks more real than these pictures, because Shrek is less detailed, so our brain doesn’t scrutinize it as much
Why arent we using this for porn? We can have all of our favorite celebrities fucking each other.
And sometimes it's "too perfect"..
Hair is something CGI always struggles with. ie Jack Nicholson's beard is just too neat and organised. You have to look closely though.
There were a few had I not been told they were chi I wouldn't have known right off but definitely that uncanny vibe from a lot of them
Hair, always check the hair...
What is uncanny valley then?
Some of these are digital paintings, not 3D renders
Yep. I've never seen light reflections that looked particularly real.
nice portfolio. might try adding some ruggedness to wonder woman though; years of training means she would have rougher hands.
The enormous chest is a giveaway too.
Still obviously fake, but better renders, no doubt about it.
Couple of these are uncanny valley but I can't place just why
rule34 vr games, come to me...
I thought so too, but it benefits from darker lighting. The higher the lights the more the giveaway, I think.
not so much the lighting, it's the subsurface scattering on the skin. soooo tricky to get right.
Just mentally change the outfit to skin coloured, it'd be the same picture. You can already see the nips and body definition.
Yeah. It's not bad, but the lighting is almost always off. Plus, there's issues with the skin on some of them along with other things.
Who is number 6... familiar, but I can’t quite put my finger on it!
Can someone explain what uncanny valley means? I’m not a photographer or photoshop expert
These aren't animated though... they're all static.
Attempt* at pure beauty. It's an obvious appeal to what people want
I'm also in VFX, maybe I know you, where do you park?
Eyes are amazingly complex to recreate, and there are hundreds of ways of doing it, so we can recreate it, it's just very hard. src: I do cg
These are pretty good but yeah light is basically impossible to accurately simulate in because it involves so much shifting randomness.
Lack of depth?
There's two more Final Fantasy films, Advent Children for FFVII (also old), and Kingsglaive for FFXV. Kingsglaive is beautifully animated.
That’s because none of them ARE animated. CG render =/= animated.
But to be frank, these aren't quite as...uncanny as some others. These are getting closer.
The eyes for me.
Does that mean you actively search them out, and confirm through additional ‘analysis’.. or homophobic..?
Oh I was halfway through typing a speel about subsurface scattering and here you are!
Personally I find the last to be impossible to discern from reality
Easy way to remember it is to think of a canny valley, but just not canny.
It's the eyes
Hoe the lighting is done on the side of his face gives it away almost immidiatly for me.
Too perfect for me.
3d porn really needs to step up its game
basically the top of the valley are things like cute CG characters like from UP then goes down to dead eye morgue animated body look
Another easy way to remember it is to think of a valley that is uncanny.
Blender + mudbox + photoshop
The ear is what sets me off on that one
a lot of these are really well done. these people just want to feel smart. "oh yea, i totally knew it was fake man."
The problem is people think in association very often, and they can remember Valley, but not uncanny as it’s a rare word these days.
This is definitely climbing its way up on the far side of the valley, though. At least to me. It's not creepy, it's just... somewhat off.
Whoa! The uncanny valley really explains my dislike for a lot of surgery-"enhanced" hollywood actresses (and some actors as well).
Each one looked like they loved me....that's how I know they are fake.
Perfect CGI fantasy pornography will soon be upon us
You mean real people aren't made of plastic? They're obviously fake, bud.
*modelled,textured,and rendered. But sure I’d love to see them animated, are they rigged?
Whoever downvoted you doesn't know their shit. Upvoted.
Hey we’ll finally get to see Denise Milani naked!
Eyes and skin always give it away.
Didn't click on "Load 15 more images" - I was pretty bored with the first 10.
HA! Have you seen the trailer for the movie?
There already is 3D porn. Not yet really life-like but getting there
Some of them are a lot more obvious than others. with 21 for example, the face is great, but the hair looks like a computer made it.
"Illustrated" is the word you're looking for.
Almost all of these lack subsurface scattering finishing touch (like when your hand turns red in light), resulting in plastic looking skin.
Mia Just Call me Diana
Yes.. it’s very easy to tell
A bit of lighting irregularities, too perfect skin, a bit of claylike facial composure.
Yeah the eyes threw me as well.
some were much easier to tell than others
next step: print them
Uncanny Valley AF
That's not exactly it though, your brain finds something off because there IS something off, but the difference is it's ability to tell what
Soon enough, though, we probably won’t be able to tell.
I stopped jerking off after the fourth picture
Only one that looked real is Heath Ledger. Must be the makeup
You can tell quite easily, but they are extremely well made.
repulsion or discomfort caused by something that looks close to human, but not close enough. able to tell the difference ≠ uncanney valley
Some of these give off the uncanny valley vibe, but a lot just look like celebrities who have been air brushed/photoshopped to look good.
I would accept it if someone said that one was a bad Photoshop touch up
Then again, there's not exactly a concrete definition, or even a universal agreement that the valley even actually exists. So ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ lol.
Neither. Ive always been extremely observant and even of very fine details. Nothing kinky about it in any way.
It's where ranch dressing that tastes kinda off comes from
You're probably right. Rendered for CGI. Modeled for 3D. Illustrated for digital illustration/photoshop, tho I guess render works here too
nah, that'd cost far too much money to make. easier and cheaper to hire actors
No, it's "posed" (the static equivalent of animated in the context of 3DCG).
Pics like these take a long time to make a video of a few seconds can cost around 100k $ at least until robots are doing it
Some of these are so much better than the others, but all of them are really beautiful.
Why not "uncanny canyon?" Or "uncannyon?" A canyon is a lot like a valley. Why'd they settle on "valley?"
5/7? What does it mean?
Look like wax figures to me. Certainly not like real people, but also not like normal CGI.
usually they're made symmetrical. easier to craft half a face and have it mirrored. too much extra work to make it unsymmetrical
Some no. The rest, they got drunk when starting the mouth!
Where can I find the nudes?
It's the way the eyes lay on the face
ok, Monica Bellucci has amazing tits tho.
So does that explain why cgi faces often have a bit of uncanny valley to them?
R u high number4 is horrible
When youve played as many video games as i have, its easy to spot the difference. One major thing is no matter what, cgi always has this 1/2
slight oilyness/shine to the skin that is much more pronounced than a normal person's skin, even with lighting angles. 2/2
angelina jolie is creepy even without the uncanny valley effect
I found the skin texture to be the giveaway on most of them; too 'plastic-y'
you probably have - when they're done *really right* you probably didn't notice :)
Yes, the skin textures are too obvious.
Believe me I'm looking forward to the first truly genuine digital simulation of a human, but it's a ways off. 1/2
Holy Uncanny Valley, Batman!
yes i can, except 4 and 8...
There need to be some big innovations in how we render particles and images; beyond just having more polygons and greater detail. 2/2
Modeled, not animated.
Mouths are dead give away
That’s what the uncanny valley is. It’s the fact that our minds are so familiar with the human face that even the slightest fraction of 1/?
Seems hair is still super hard to get right but they're getting damn close.
Divergence from the proportions we know so well, appears instantly unreal. It’s to do with our unparalleled pattern recognition skills 1/2
Ahah no It's Computer Generated Image, even though any picture is loaded by a computer it is not generated, a square in (1/2)
These aren't animated, you don't know what animated means.
Some look real, but others seem to have some kind of texture off that is unreal enough to know. I can usually spot CGI just by motion though
That's why Jesus invented DeepFakes.
Plenty of people have lifeless eyes. I can't see the difference.
paint would be CGI but a photography of an actual painting wouldn't be CGI
Just gotta be that dick who points out that none of these have been animated all all. They’re static images... still, credit to the artists
i was just thinking that, if it wasn't for the eyes you can't tell it isn't real. neat
yeah i can tell
What most of these need is something called Subsurface Scattering. Basically gives more realistic depth, color, veins, etc. to skin.
Yeah something is off on most of them. Usually the textures.
That’s the texturing of the skin, it’s a feature called sub surface scattering and it’s how the light is diffused through the skin
Username checks out.
Yes. I can tell.
If you get it slightly wrong, the skin looks waxy
It's always the eyes.
Daniel Craig’s skin has its spec map up too high and some of the women have too much sub surface scattering. Some of the old people are 1/2
Only the third one could have fooled me, all others are obvious
Amazing though, and I appreciate that all of them are brilliant compared to anything I could hope to produce so yeah 2/2
the eyes seem to be a giveaway in a lot of them
I think some static renderings are photorealistic perfect but for sure I’ve never seen an animated cgi I didn’t instie know was cgi
Five days a week
Though they're very well done, it's still very obvious that they're not actual photos.
Can't you still feel like something is odd/off ?
A majority of these photos yes I can, a few of them no - but some of he ones I can, it’s not even the uncanny valley, but lighting etc 1/2
With most render engines, its the other way around. Dim, or heavily contrasted lighting will just kill it. Was probably done in post.
and hair, on some hairs are too large, on some hair is of too low density, materials too shiny, too perfect, clothes too rigid...
Which from my understanding isn’t really the uncanny valley. That’s to do with proportions of the face. I could be wrong tho 2/2
so many pornibilities
most of these are too realistic for me to fall into that
Well aren't you a condescending cunt. I bet you're fun, though.
1,2,3, and 4 are the best. The other ones look Cg like a mofo.
They are not "animated", they are "rendered".
Ooo man, still getting some heavy uncanny valley vibes though
I could tell, everything looks so 'stiff' even if it's posed, or it's too smooth looking to be human
Also upvoted but since we’re being pedantic, it’s “none of them IS.” “None” is short for “not one” or “no one.”
Makes me want to post a bunch of real pics, claim they are CGI, and watch the comments like “I could totally tell it was fake, tooo uncanny”
Not animated, but I know what you were trying to communicate. Very nice works.
I thought uncanny valley was some kind of sex euphemism..
I feel like 14 looks like an air brushed model pic. Would not question it if I saw it in a magazine.
Mostly in their eyes, dont know why
To me the texture of the skin, I can see the "rubber" just enough
looks like a badly designed android that's going to strangle you with it's hidden dick while you sleep
Definitely the best head of all by far. I see it in the shoulder tho. The skeleton
But that head is straight perfect. Amazing!
How is it too well groomed? I'd argue that I've met people with hair that neat in real life
"None of These Images Are Real People" No fucking shit.
Come on guys, if you were a given some of them without knowing, you'd be fooled. Some are very good. I think good bokeh helps...
I've seen it once before in a rat, and I see it now in men.
Hair too perfect
Should it be "N'one" then?
Theoretically, but that ship has sailed.
I guess if I hadn't read the title first I wouldn't be able to tell what was off, just that something wasn't right
Humanlike characters are said to be in the "uncanny valley" when they resemble real humans but are not quote there, making them a bit creepy
Looks too much like wax or clay. Skin texture and lighting needs refined
Except when they don’t
It is a computer generated image
Who cares honestly?
You should have waited until the end before you told us that would have made this post so much cooler but now it's just mildly interesting.
Yes, I can tell. I think most of us can, tho?
The Jack (heeeeeeeeeeres jonny!) one is pretty good tbh
Excellent yes, but nowhere near hard to spot, sorry :-)
Sooooo, how do you know that you’ve never been wrong? If you don’t research or test a hypothesis, you know nothing about the theory.
Holy fuck.. Its almost past uncanny valley
And the eyes
Firstly: these are still images, so they're not “animated to perfection”. Secondly: some are better than others, but yes, we can tell.
ye, looks a bit like a overdone studio photo with a lot of retouching
7, 8, and 18 were the only ones that got me
What is that?
Except for the 18, yep I can tell.
So given enough cheap rendering farms porn actors will be out of a job. Hopefully they'll turn to prostitution.
The facial hair on him was what killed it for me. The close up of the ladies face was the most realistic imo
Most of us can. They're awesome but lacks that something what makes us more human
None of these is animated. It would be even easier to spot, like with Rachel in Blade Runner and Grand Moff Tarkin in Rogue One.
To me it's slightly off-center to the tip of the nose. More so than a slight smirk could account for.
Animated? You mean Rendered?
The last one though
It would be amazing if video game graphics got to this level of realism.
Many of them are VERY good and realistic (at first and second glance). But watch them animate, and all of them would drop like a rock.
Their eyes give it away for me. The reflection, shine and color all scream perfect.
I can tell
It's Britney, b**ch
Uncanney Valley is a thing.
Souls are missing
There's some good stuff here though most give aways are lighting, it looks like they slapped a HDRI and called it done. 2) skin texture /2
Detail is important. We are made up of blues / yellows / reds / greens and it's all mixed together. A lot of these are air brushed skin /3
First thing I said out loud looking at the first pic.
No-one gonna say 24?
With little change in hue or saturation. And last the eyes... eyes are vary tough they will be the first thing judged and looked at. Most /4
Look empty and like marbles in a maniquin. Giving something for them to reflect and paying attenchion to the way the eyes reflect light /5
And take light in down to the way the skin folds cup the eyeball is super important. With out these details they will look dead and empty.
Or think of a can, then imagine a valley without any
Dear comment-section. complaining about lifeless eyes won't make you seem sophisticated
These are all off a bit
The grandma looks amazing at first and then the uncanny valley strikes hard. Especially thanks to the eyes.
The women's eyes are too big
These are 3D models that have been Rendered.
They look like wax works figures
It's like I'm back at cghub site.. miss that website.. really good artist.
Folks on here are too harsh there are a bunch that are easy to see as CGI but they are more than a couple that are very photorealistic.
A lot of it is realy just needing more detail. Ray Tracing is already advaced enough in many cases.
"We finally perfected a cg image of a human being, now what?" "Let's make them disgusting so we can relate to them!"
None of these were animated, why you lyin?
The lips give it away. Aside from that I wouldn't have guessed
This. Hair is a dead giveaway on most of these.
The ones with giant Tim-Burton-Wonderland-nightmare-fuel eyes tho...
Uncanny valley? We are all fucked.
In 5 or 10 years they won't need live actors anymore which will be great because then we won't have to listen to their leftist BS anymore
You think we wouldn't notice the abnormally huge eye ones? At least the first has proper no-bra boobs.
Every one here mentioning the term uncanny valley sounds like a first year film student not shutting up about the wilhelm scream.
There is something slightly off about all of them. Dunno if it’s the lighting but something makes it look odd
Human skin is amazing in that at the same time there is a glisten, as well as a dull hue about it. CGI lighting cannot get it right to match
No, tell it to me in Star Wars.
I think the biggest give away is the "NON ANIMATION" part...
Thank you! Nice tiddies!
Skin is off for me. Just isn't right..
Where are the animated ones?
We are so close.
The lifeless eyes always give it away.
Though I walk through the uncanny valley, I shall fear no CGI, for it is I, the distinguisher of life's reality
Yep I also think there's something off about the eyes... but other than that, it looks very convincing
I mean none of them are animated tho....
Yeah anime eyes on a few.
The eyes. Most just look... wrong. Or how the light makes the skin look oily.
Lighting and that it is not a PERFECT representation of actors/tresses that we know what they look like, if it was done on random people yes
Perhaps it lacks more buzzwords. 3d printed crowdsourced textures made by an AI!!
Honestly for me that one was the scar. I mean it could have been bad prop makeup but as a real scar/injury it didn't make the cut.
Amusingly, the it comes from latin anima, that means soul or vital essence. In a way texturing and rendering those models gives them a soul
Number 1 looks as real as any instagram model's photosets though. Just heavily photo-shopped and a narrow depth of field.
Soon there will be no need for actors
Those are way over classical "horror" uncanny valley for me, they just look slightly stylized, if post said it is filter i would belive.
8, 18, and 20 were the only ones that look real to me. Barely 20.
That's the thing, though. I would. I look at stuff like this and my brain screams at me, telling me there's something wrong.
His head looks like it's shaped wrong to me
What's with the oversized eyes on like a quarter of them? I thought the goal was to be indistinguishable from reality?
The real crime is the title. These are all really impressive, there's a lot more respect to be had if you know what this takes to do.
Who are the women pictures based on?
that dead look in the eyes gives it a way
Know when skynet has robots in rubber suits? I feel that's what these would look like. Right? But kinda wrong at the same time...
Who is it based on?
8 only works if you cover his fake lips. Give it a try
I feel like there's a waxy nature to the skin that gives it all away. I don't know how else to explain it other than the uncanny valley.
Some of these look suspiciously like the figures from that wax museum in nyc.
The eyes for sure
If it were in motion we'd likely be unable to tell.
I was just gonna say that :)
If you have seen people before, this is very obvious.
Well its not scientific! Its either been proven by others who knew them, or by themselves etc.
Some of these are great. Others will never claw their way out of the shadows in the bottom of the uncanny valley.
22 looks like I'm about to get nuked
Holy uncanny valley, Batman!
Very few of the eyes are convincing, the Daniel craig one was the most realistic in my opinion
Some of these fall right in there, but I feel some fall into a second uncannier valley, past being slightly off, and into being too close.
Some of them you can’t really tell, but most of them have this dead eye look. The girl with the glasses couldn’t be more obvious if there
Game engines yes, but my experience with 3D programs is dark is easier. Definitely a lot was done in post for all CG rendering though
was a neon sign above her head. But they’re cool.
So many of them have dead eye. Or no veining in the eye which to me sort of screams photoshopped. Source, I do a lot of colourizations of
b&w pics to colour which sort of... aside from perfecting the depth in skin tone, the eyes are the hardest part cause they just look dead if
you don’t get the depth/texture right.
The deadeye doesn’t help with some of them. I think the ones with backgrounds are the least obvious. The fact some are really bad pixel wise
Make them more obvious.
14/8/7/4 for me. With Joker it mostly just comes off as real photo that was touched up to make the paint vibrant.
That's nice, sweetie.
Sometimes the eyes give it away
well, since none of these are gifs, we can't really tell how well they were ANIMATED, but they were RENDERED very well
Dan Roarty is the shit
If you can’t tell these are CGI get your arse to a opticians asap
Right on get me learnt thanks
Needs moar subsurface scattering.
I believe they are all real people.. they are just perfect drawings of people... not photographs
I feel like the problem is the artists who always wants all the fine detail to be more visible than it is on a real person
It would be cool to see a side by side and guess which one is which
The eyes man...always the eyes. They look empty.
95% of them yes, easy, the Angelina Jolie one is good though and the dude 2 below that
“None” is a word in its own right at this point; the older grammar of a word or phrase is not necessarily the correct grammar.
But that's why I can tell they're not real, just glancing at them makes my brain scream.
It has more to do with the fact that it is a very generic male model shot with no distinguishing features.
You know, I could see “hologram museums” usurping wax museums in the near future (provided that wax museums are still a thing)
Haha I know right.
Most of these do not appear human, but some do.
Oh wow we are gross
Is that chinese elon musk?
Most of the females I could tell at first glance, the rest took a second look
Eh, it all depends on what detail in particular, old movies in barely 480p are clearly real while the best CGI Disney's money can buy 1/2
are painfully fake. Detail is an important aspect, but i don't think it's the most important, or even necessary in a lot of ways.
For me, it was the eyes. They look real, but there was nothing behind the light in the eyes. It was lifeless....
Like following a sound into a room only to find the room is totally empty....
If I hadn’t read te title then I wouldn’t have guess over half of these weren’t real, should left those details for the end
That hair, though...
Excellent, but they're not animated
Was looking for this comment and fortunately got you to 666 upvotes at the same time, eyyyyy.
Yes. I can tell.
Can’t wait for this to be used for porn.
Why would anybody care?
Also notice how the ones with a background tend to look heaps more believable - this is because the cg artist has used the background 1/2
As a reflection map on all surfaces - eg hair reflects the balloons etc. light is never in a void irl, it bounces off everything 2/2
Yes. I can tell- most people can. There is a scientific term- the word escapes me regarding a human's ability to distinguish real humans.
Gandhi looks like a retarded Chihuahua.
few are misleading but in the end you see its fake.. other than the few.. instantly can tell they are CGI
If only game graphics were to this degree all world problems would end.
They are very good but yes I can tell
In the years you won't even need actors!
why didn't the last one have the goguglobbula
they all look cg
The uncanny valley hits hard. I‘m kinda creeped out...
that one actually creeped me out, its the lips
For some of them it’s the facial symmetry or cartoonish features. If it’s too perfect it isn’t real.
One of them is actually ballpoint from what I remember
This is why the movie mars needs moms was a disaster. They’ll never make the mistake again. Too costly.
I don't believe you. Some of those are real.
No, your brain doesn't scream when you look at cartoon, even if you can tell it's fake.
How the hell would you know what my brain does and doesn't do?
I got news for you OP, none of those are animated here. Therefore none are animated to near perfection.
That's the idea of uncanny valley. And it's for general population. Not everything is about you, MrJaunty.
Those're the words I usually see associated with this kinda stuff
They are no animated.
It is when you say 'you' or 'your' when making a statement, mate.
idon't belive this picture wasn't doctored with either.
If you close your eyes it fixes that. I see steve buscemi every night when I sleep
speaking as an irl woman. Women are fucking creepy in CGI. Every single woman in this compilation is uncanny valley as fuck! x.x
Really? Which engine do you use? The ones I've been working with struggle to stop noise in the dark and take forever to render when bright.
You're more perceptive than I am in this genre. I wouldn't be able to tell.
They should do this with historical figures..
I'd like to take a trip to the uncanny valley... if you know what I mean!